- #Macbook pro early 2013 screen resolution upgrade
- #Macbook pro early 2013 screen resolution software
- #Macbook pro early 2013 screen resolution plus
The improvement in contrast ratio is the most tangible for me however, aside from the increase in resolution of course.Ī tremendous benefit of being a provider of both software and hardware for the Mac platform is Apple can obviously sync the introduction of new features in both. The old MacBook Pro had a really good display but this just takes it to the next level. When I'm back in the office I'll take some good shots of the wide viewing angles afforded by the new IPS Retina Display. Contrast ratio takes a huge step forward: Viewing angles are much improved, as are black levels:īrightness appears to be down a bit compared to last year's high-res model, but the improvement in black levels more than makes up for the loss. The MacBook Pro's Retina Display is the first IPS based panel Apple has ever used in a MacBook. I'll reserve my final judgement until I've used the display in more varied conditions however.Īs always, Apple chose to deal with the issues of glare and reflections by integrating an extremely bright panel with great black levels. Compared to my matte MacBook Pro, the Retina Display is obviously more glossy but at the same time remarkably close. I've never been particularly bothered by glossy screens so I'm really the wrong person to ask whether or not the reduction in reflections makes it usable. Instead the Retina Display's two glass layers are different sizes, which you can sort of see in the cross section below:īy removing the cover glass Apple reduces the number of reflections and thus glare, however it's important to point out that this still isn't a matte display.
The MacBook Pro with Retina Display uses a similar LCD construction to the MacBook Air/matte-MBP, without a cover glass. The MacBook Air and the high-res/matte display on the other hand did not have any cover glass and instead hid the LCD panel behind a bezel.
#Macbook pro early 2013 screen resolution plus
In the standard (glossy) MacBook Pro, Apple had a standard LCD arrangement with two sheets of glass plus a third piece of cover glass that gave it the seamless edge-to-edge glass appearance. When I'm doing a lot of work I prefer the 1920 x 1200 setting, but if I'm in content consumption mode I find myself happier at 1440 x 900 or 1680 x 1050.įewer Reflections, Hugely Improved Contrast I also appreciate how quick it is to switch between resolutions on OS X. It looks like Apple actually renders the screen at twice the selected resolution before scaling it to fit the 2880 x 1800 panel (in other words, at 1920 x 1200 Apple is rendering everything at 3840 x 2400 (!) before scaling - this is likely where the perf impact is seen, but I'm trying to find a way to quantify that now). The gallery below gives you a look at the five settings.Įven at the non-integer scaled 1680 x 1050 setting, the Retina Display looks a lot better than last year's high-res panel.
Thankfully Apple offers 1680 x 10 x 1200 scaling options that trade a bit of image quality and performance for added real estate.
#Macbook pro early 2013 screen resolution upgrade
If you're like me however and opted for the 1680 x 1050 "high-res" upgrade last generation, this won't do. At 1440 x 900 you don't get any increase in usable desktop resolution compared to a standard 15-inch MacBook Pro, but everything is ridiculously crisp. To recap, Retina Display MBP owners now get a slider under OS X's Display Preferences that allow you to specify desktop resolutions other than 1440 x 900. I've touched on the SSD speed bump already, and I've talked about how Apple is handling DPI scaling in Lion. MacBook Pro with Retina Display Comparisonġ x Firewire 800, 1 x Audio Line in, 1 x Audio Line out, SDXC reader, Kensington Lock slotĪlthough Haswell will likely be a great fit for the next-gen MacBook Pro, anyone who travels a lot and does a good amount of work with their machine will be seriously tempted to upgrade now. There's the display for those who stare at their computers all day, there's the significant reduction in thickness and weight for those who want portability in a quad-core machine, and there's the significant GPU/SSD spec bump for those who crave performance. Apple, as always, has done an excellent job of giving users enough reasons to want this thing. I'm in San Francisco until tomorrow morning, but aside from dinner I've been spending as much time with the next-gen MacBook Pro as possible.
0 kommentar(er)
